Calculator
Withdrawal Rate
4.00%
Drawdown Analysis
At 4.00% withdrawal your money is projected to run out around year 30, short of the 30-year goal. A lower return or higher inflation may be to blame — consider trimming withdrawals toward the 4% figure of $40,000.
After decades of accumulating wealth, retirement presents a fundamentally different challenge: converting a finite pool of savings into a reliable stream of income that must last for the rest of your life. This decumulation phase is psychologically and mathematically harder than saving—instead of watching your balance grow, you must withdraw from it steadily while markets rise and fall, all the while your expenses climb with inflation. For American retirees whose income now depends on 401(k) and IRA balances rather than pensions, getting this phase right determines whether retirement ends in comfort or financial panic. The most famous solution is the 4% rule, born from Trinity University research often called the Trinity Study. It suggests that withdrawing 4 percent of your initial portfolio in year one and adjusting that dollar amount for inflation thereafter gives a high probability of savings lasting thirty years across a broad stock-and-bond mix. But the rule has limits: retiring early at 40 demands a lower rate, while flexible spending tolerates more. A drawdown calculator tests your exact numbers, revealing how far the money stretches and whether your plan survives inflation and market assumptions.
The calculator runs a year-by-year simulation rather than relying on a single closed-form formula. Each year, your balance grows by the assumed return, then the year's withdrawal is subtracted, and the withdrawal itself is inflated before the next year begins. The sequence continues until either the balance goes negative—revealing exactly which year the money runs out—or the portfolio survives the full retirement horizon. To isolate the true erosion of purchasing power, the simulation applies a real return computed as (1 + nominal return) / (1 + inflation) − 1, a more precise treatment than simple subtraction. Your starting withdrawal rate is simply the first-year withdrawal divided by the nest egg, and we surface the dollar income implied by the classic 4 percent guideline for direct comparison. Remember this is deterministic: it assumes average returns every year, so it cannot capture sequence-of-returns risk—two consecutive bear markets early in retirement hurt far more than the same losses late.
Two portfolios can return the same 6 percent average over thirty years, yet the one that takes early losses can fail while the other thrives. Poor returns right after retirement compound against a shrinking balance and inflated withdrawals. Mitigate this by keeping one to two years of spending in cash or short-term bonds so you never sell depressed investments in a downturn.
The Trinity research analyzed thirty-year retirements, and success rates degrade meaningfully over longer horizons. For FIRE retirees planning forty-five-plus years, researchers recommend starting at 3 to 3.5 percent instead. At 65 your horizon may be 25 years; at 40 it is realistically 50 or more, and withdrawal rates must fall to match.
Research shows that trimming spending by 10 percent after bad market years can substantially boost the sustainable withdrawal rate versus a rigid path. Real retirees rarely keep spending flat anyway—they travel in healthy early years and spend less later. Guardrails that cut after losses and splurge after gains are often worth more than any portfolio tweak.
Re-run your numbers with the assumed return dropped by 4 percentage points to mimic retiring into a bear market. If the portfolio still survives, your plan is robust; if it breaks, raise your cash buffer or lower the starting withdrawal while the decision is still a planning exercise rather than an emergency.
Delaying Social Security from 62 to 70 increases the guaranteed benefit by roughly 8 percent per year. Many retirees draw down portfolio assets faster in early years to finance that delay, exchanging volatile portfolio withdrawals for an inflation-protected lifetime annuity. Model both before locking in a claiming age.
Withdrawals from traditional 401(k)s and IRAs are taxed as ordinary income, while Roth withdrawals are tax-free. If your math says you need $40,000 of spending, a traditional-IRA retiree actually needs roughly $50,000 of gross withdrawals to land that much after federal tax. Plan the account mix before assuming your income target.
Jack and Linda Miller retired together at 63 with $950,000 and planned to draw $50,000 per year—a 5.3 percent starting rate. The calculator showed money running out in their late seventies, right when they wanted to leave something for grandchildren. They trimmed to $42,000 annually and delayed Social Security, extending the projection safely past age 90.
Sasha, 41, had $1.2 million and wanted $45,000 a year to retire early. Over a 45-year horizon, the tool projected exhaustion around year 38. She cut the target to $42,000 (a 3.5 percent rate) and kept a $90,000 cash cushion—two years of spending—so she could avoid selling in downturns, and the plan held.
Ramon retired in early 2022 at 66 and immediately watched his balanced portfolio fall 15 percent. Because he had run exactly this scenario, he drew from a prebuilt cash reserve instead of selling stocks and let winners refill the reserve. His plan assumed a mediocre first year, so the hit barely moved his projected longevity.
Everything you need to know about this topic.

Financial Chaos Analyst
Ivy Sinclair-Wren is a Financial Chaos Analyst covering investing, AI, wealth psychology, and the emotional consequences of opening finance apps during market crashes. Based in Melbourne, she specializes in demystifying the US tax code and helping users navigate the intersection of spreadsheet logic and human irrationality.