Calculator
Present Value (Lump Sum Today)
$114,699.21
Valuation Analysis
11.5× each payment: at 6% over 20 years, every $10,000.00 payment in the stream is worth that multiple in present-value terms. The stream's $200,000 in future cash is worth only $114,699.21 today — a $85,300.79 time-value discount (74% of the present value). That gap is the price of waiting, and it is exactly what a lump-sum offer should be judged against.
*The present value result depends entirely on the discount rate chosen; small changes in the rate can change the valuation materially. The tool assumes constant payments and a constant rate with no taxes. Educational only, not investment or tax advice.
An annuity is simply a series of equal payments spread over time — a pension, a settlement, lottery installments, or rental income. The present value of that annuity answers the question every stream of future money raises: what is all those future payments worth in today's dollars, right now? Money received later is worth less than money received today, because today's money can start earning immediately, so each distant payment must be shrunk by the time it is delayed. Add up all those discounted payments and the total is the lump sum that would be economically equivalent to the stream. For US investors this is the math behind the most common either/or decision in personal finance: pension or lump sum, structured settlement or cash-out, monthly installments or a single check. The nominal totals make the answer look obvious — twenty years of $18,000 payments 'adds up' to $360,000 — but the present value at a realistic discount rate is usually far less, often half or less of the face total. That gap is the time value of money, and it is exactly the number an insurance company profits from when you accept too-good-sounding future payments. This tool computes the present value, shows the gap between face value and today's worth, and gives you the annuity factor so you can judge whether a lump-sum offer on the table beats keeping the stream.
The classic formula discounts every payment at the periodic rate: present value equals the payment times one minus one plus r raised to the negative n, all divided by r, where r is the per-period rate and n the number of periods. Each payment is worth payment divided by one plus r to the power of its period number, so the first payment is barely discounted and the last payment is discounted for the full journey. The closed form is just the sum of that geometric series. If the rate is zero, the present value is simply the payment times the count — no discounting, face value equals today's worth. The annuity factor — present value divided by one payment — is the workhorse number: it tells you how many payments' worth the stream equals in cash today. A 20-year annual stream at 6% has a factor around 11.5, meaning the whole income stream is worth about 11.5 annual payments as a lump sum. The time-value discount is the face total minus the present value, and the effective annual yield converts a monthly rate into the annual figure for comparison with other investments. When evaluating a real offer, set the discount rate to what you could reasonably earn on a lump sum today — a conservative bond-or-portfolio return — because that opportunity cost is what you give up by taking installments instead of cash.
Present value moves sharply with the rate: at 4%, a 25-year $18,000 stream is worth around $283,000; at 7%, only about $207,000. Both numbers are 'correct' — they just reflect different assumptions about what else your money could earn. Before valuing any real offer, settle on a defensible rate tied to what you would actually do with a lump sum, and run the valuation at one point higher and one point lower to see how much the answer depends on the assumption.
A lump sum gives control: you can invest it, spend it, or leave it — but you can also blow it. A guaranteed annuity stream enforces discipline you may not have. This tool prices the economics, but the right answer also depends on behavior. If you have a track record of spending windfalls, the 'worse' economic value of forced installments may be the better outcome for you. Price both, then let your self-knowledge break the tie.
If you are choosing between a pension and a lump sum you could use to buy an annuity, find out what monthly income the lump sum would purchase at current annuity rates and compare it to the pension's payment. The stream with the higher income per dollar of present value is the better deal mechanically. This calculator's annuity factor lets you reverse the same logic: if an offered lump sum is far below the computed present value at a fair rate, the seller is keeping the spread.
When someone offers you future payments for a lump sum (or vice versa), discount the stream at the return you could realistically earn by investing that lump sum yourself. If the offered cash is below that present value, you are being asked to sell your future income at a discount to what you could make on your own. Use the breakdown's annuity factor to sanity-check: very long streams should approach 1/r at low rates.
A $18,000 annual pension and a $1,500 monthly settlement are different calculations, because monthly cash starts earning immediately instead of waiting a year. Always set the frequency toggle to match the actual offer and enter the per-period payment. A monthly stream is worth slightly more than its annual-total equivalent at the same annual rate, purely because the money arrives earlier.
Many real streams are fixed in nominal dollars (pensions often are) or partially taxable. A fixed $18,000/year for 25 years loses purchasing power every year inflation runs, which a constant discount rate understates. If the stream is not inflation-adjusted, use a higher effective discount rate to reflect the erosion, and account for taxes on the payments, which reduce the spendable amount below the face figure.
Linda was offered $245,000 lump sum or $18,000 a year for life from her pension. Running the present value at a conservative 5% over her expected payout years, the stream was worth more than the offer — and it came with longevity protection the lump sum could not. She took the monthly pension, knowing the numbers, not the sales pitch, had driven the choice.
Marcus was offered a 15-year monthly payout at an implied discount rate of 7.5% — far above what he could earn safely. Computing the present value at his own 5% opportunity rate showed the insurer's offer undervalued the stream, but he wanted the cash now for a business, so he negotiated the lump sum up closer to the computed present value before signing, adding meaningful money by simply quoting the number.
Anita was comparing two settlement offers, one annual and one monthly, both nominally equal. Modeling both at the same rate, the monthly offer came out several thousand dollars higher in present value because each installment arrived earlier. The annual offer had looked identical on paper; the calculator revealed the difference the face values hid.
Everything you need to know about this topic.

Financial Chaos Analyst
Ivy Sinclair-Wren is a Financial Chaos Analyst covering investing, AI, wealth psychology, and the emotional consequences of opening finance apps during market crashes. Based in Melbourne, she specializes in demystifying the US tax code and helping users navigate the intersection of spreadsheet logic and human irrationality.