Calculator
Stock Position
Protective Put
Floor Price (Max Protection)
$92.75
Hedge Analysis
All 1,000 shares are fully covered by the puts. The hard floor sits at $92.75 per share (strike minus premium), capping your maximum loss at $7,250. Insurance costs 2.3% of position value, a moderate premium typical for at- or near-the-money protection on a standard-volatility name.
*Option premiums, volatility, and bid-ask spreads change continuously; the floor and cost figures here assume the premium entered is paid. This model values protection at expiration and excludes commissions and taxes. Educational only, not investment advice.
A protective put is an insurance policy on stock you own: you buy a put option while keeping the shares, which lets you sell at the strike price no matter how far the stock falls. The upside of the stock remains yours, because puts do not cap gains — they only install a floor. For US investors who have large unrealized gains they do not want to trigger taxes on, or who are nervous about a binary event like earnings or an election, the protective put is the standard single-stock hedge. The cost of the policy is the premium, and like house insurance it is spent whether or not a disaster happens. The strategy's appeal is that it converts an undefined downside into a defined one — a known maximum loss — while leaving the right tail fully open. That asymmetry is worth paying for in concentrated positions, employer stock you cannot diversify yet, or portfolios with hard spending needs. The tradeoff is straightforward: the premium is a drag on returns in normal markets, so the decision is really about how much the certainty is worth. This tool prices that certainty: it computes the floor price per share, the total insurance cost as a percentage of the position, the share of the portfolio actually covered, and the exact maximum loss if everything goes wrong.
With a protective put, the payoff on each insured share is capped below at the strike price: if the stock finishes anywhere below the strike, the put is exercised or sold for the difference, so the position is worth strike minus the premium paid — the floor. Above the strike, the put expires worthless and the shares profit normally; the premium is the premium's only cost. The floor price is therefore strike price minus premium per share, the level below which the portfolio cannot fall per share. Maximum loss on the insured portion equals (stock price − floor) times the number of insured shares, plus the full current value of any unhedged shares. Coverage accounting matters as much as the floor. One put contract protects 100 shares, so a 1,000-share position needs ten contracts for full coverage; buying fewer insures only a percentage of the portfolio and the rest keeps its full downside. The insurance cost percentage — total premium divided by position value — is the clearest comparison metric: it lets you judge an at-the-money policy against a cheap out-of-the-money tail policy on the same footing. This calculator runs all of those numbers simultaneously, including the effective cost basis after the hedge, so you know exactly what the insurance adds to your break-even.
The strike price is your insurance deductible: an at-the-money put carries no deductible but costs 4–6% of the position for a quarter, while a 10% out-of-the-money strike costs a fraction of that and only pays in a genuine crash. Decide first whether you fear a routine drawdown or a tail event, then buy the strike that matches. Buying the wrong deductible — paying top dollar to insure the first 5% — is the most common way the strategy underwhelms.
Put premiums are priced by demand: when everyone is scared, implied volatility soars and the same protection costs two or three times more. The disciplined approach is to buy protection in calm markets while holding the hedge through the event. Entering hedges during a panic means paying a fear premium that often evaporates before the protection is needed, making the insurance look overpriced precisely when it is most demanded.
If you run protection continuously, you own an insurance program with an ongoing premium budget — typically 1–2% of the position per year for a tail hedge. That drag is real and compounds against your returns, so treat it as a standing cost of the strategy rather than a one-off. Investors who budget the program explicitly either size it sustainably or decide they would rather keep the emergency fund than roll options.
A stop-loss order costs nothing but executes at the market price and can gap through your level in fast markets. Run both this calculator's hedge cost and your stop-loss assumption side by side: the put's premium is the price of guaranteed execution. If the premium exceeds what you could plausibly lose to slippage, the hedge must be justified by the certainty, not the math.
Enter your actual share count and check whether the hedge is full or partial before buying. Most brokers let you see the exact share-to-contract ratio in the order ticket; if it does not line up, decide intentionally which portion goes uninsured. A half-hedge entered by mistake is a full hedge that simply forgot half the position.
Pull the current implied volatility for the put you are buying from the options chain. If IV is historically elevated, the premium includes a fear surcharge and the same strike may be cheaper later. Entering the premium into this tool at today's quote gives the true cost; entering what you 'expect' the premium to be after a vol crush is how hedges get priced too optimistically.
Sarah held a large, low-cost-basis tech position she refused to sell for tax reasons. Ahead of a volatile quarter she bought five-percent out-of-the-money puts covering every share. The stock fell 18%, her puts paid off almost dollar for dollar, and she kept the shares — the hedge had cost about 1.4% of the position and saved her from a forced sale at the bottom.
Raj regularly bought at-the-money puts during market panics and watched the premiums deflate when things calmed. He switched to a calendar program: buying tail protection in calm months at low implied volatility and holding it through events. His annual hedge budget dropped by half while the coverage level actually improved.
Monica wanted to hedge 600 shares into a binary announcement and initially planned three contracts. Checking the calculator revealed three contracts protect only 300 shares — half her position — while full coverage requires six. Making that choice deliberately, she sized to the coverage she actually wanted instead of assuming a contract-per-hundred-shares rule she had half remembered.
Everything you need to know about this topic.

Financial Chaos Analyst
Ivy Sinclair-Wren is a Financial Chaos Analyst covering investing, AI, wealth psychology, and the emotional consequences of opening finance apps during market crashes. Based in Melbourne, she specializes in demystifying the US tax code and helping users navigate the intersection of spreadsheet logic and human irrationality.