Calculator
Winning Path
Rent & Invest
Buy Path Net
$155,816.74
Rent + Invest
$280,389.63
Rent vs. Buy Analysis
Renting and investing wins by $124,572.89 after 10 years. The renter invests the $92,000 the buyer sinks upfront plus the monthly gap between the buyer's outlay and the rent, and at 8% it compounds into $280,389.63 — beating the buyer's $247,816.74 of net equity. Home appreciation of 3.5% plus closing costs and maintenance cannot keep pace with the market over this horizon.
*Assumes a 30-year fixed mortgage, excludes property taxes, insurance, rent inflation, and home-equity tax benefits. Real outcomes vary by market; this is educational only, not financial advice.
Should you buy a house, or keep renting and pour the difference into the stock market? Few personal-finance questions are debated more fiercely, because the honest answer changes with interest rates, rent levels, and the length of time you plan to stay. Buying forces you to save through a mortgage, locks in most of your housing cost, and adds leverage to home appreciation. Renting keeps capital liquid and unleveraged — and historically US stocks have outperformed housing by a healthy annual margin. The debate is rarely settled because most people compare a mortgage payment to rent and stop there. The real comparison is between two competing portfolios: home equity built through down payment, appreciation, and debt paydown, versus a taxable investment portfolio built from the monthly cash a renter saves relative to a buyer. Closing costs, maintenance, and the interest-heavy early years of a mortgage all tilt the math, and their weight depends almost entirely on how long you stay. That is precisely the arithmetic this tool runs — both paths, side by side, in dollars.
The buy path starts with the down payment plus closing costs as upfront cash. The mortgage payment comes from the standard amortization formula for a 30-year fixed loan, and a month-by-month loop tracks how much principal remains after your stay horizon. The home value grows at your appreciation rate; selling costs and the remaining loan balance come off the sale price to leave net equity, minus what you put in upfront. The rent path is cash-flow matched so the comparison is fair: the renter invests whatever the buyer spends each month on the mortgage plus maintenance that exceeds the rent payment. Monthly contributions grow at your assumed stock return, and the final balance is the renter's portfolio. Whichever ledger is bigger at the end of the horizon wins the dollar argument — but only in dollars. Property-tax benefits, mortgage-interest deductions, rent inflation, and lifestyle factors sit outside the model and can swing a real decision.
Buy and sell closing costs alone can run 10–11% of a home's value. Spread over three years that is a 3–4% annual drag that appreciation must overcome before the buyer breaks even; spread over ten years it nearly disappears. Short horizons almost always favor renting unless the local market is appreciating unusually fast.
At 6.5%, roughly 60% of your first payment goes to interest, and principal paydown is slow early on. The renter's ledger grows from day one at market rates while the buyer's equity builds slowly — which is why the stock-market return assumption has so much power over the verdict in the first decade.
This model treats rent as flat while the mortgage is fixed — an assumption favorable to renting in the dollars. In reality rents rise about 3% a year on average, eroding the renter's investable surplus over time, while the buyer's principal-and-interest payment never changes. Long stays tilt the real-world result toward owning even when this tool calls it close.
Before running numbers, be honest about how long you will stay. Under five years, the cost math usually favors renting; past ten, the friction costs stop mattering and the comparison becomes a true investment question.
Divide the home price by one year of rent. Under 15, buying tends to win in dollars; over 20–25, renting typically does. Your local ratio is the fastest market temperature check before you trust the calculator's verdict.
The rent-and-invest path only wins if the renter really invests the monthly savings rather than absorbing a larger apartment or lifestyle. If your honest answer is that the surplus would be spent, lean toward treating the buyer's forced savings as worth a lot more than this model assumes.
Priya and Dan were torn between a $420k starter home and renting for $2,400. This tool showed renting and investing at 8% beat owning by $31,000 at the 10-year mark — so they kept renting, banked the difference every month, and revisited at year 8 when their down payment had nearly doubled and the price-to-rent ratio in their zip code had softened.
Nathan almost bought a condo he planned to sell in four years for a new job. The breakdown showed $33,000 in combined closing costs plus maintenance eating almost all of his projected appreciation over so short a hold — buying came out $21,000 behind renting even at 4% appreciation. He rented, and the same model five years later showed buying ahead by $85,000 once he planned to stay put.
The Ortiz family wanted a $650k home but their rent was $3,200, and here renting and investing won by six figures over 15 years at 9% market returns. Instead they bought the $480k version, cut the mortgage payment below their rent, and invested the gap themselves — ending with both home equity and a meaningful portfolio, rather than betting everything on one appreciating asset.
Everything you need to know about this topic.

Financial Chaos Analyst
Ivy Sinclair-Wren is a Financial Chaos Analyst covering investing, AI, wealth psychology, and the emotional consequences of opening finance apps during market crashes. Based in Melbourne, she specializes in demystifying the US tax code and helping users navigate the intersection of spreadsheet logic and human irrationality.