Calculator
Dividend Yield
1.60%
Yield Analysis
At 1.60%, this is a modest-yield stock. Your $15,000 position produces $240 a year. Growth (5%) matters more here than current income — focus on dividend-growth durability.
*Dividend yield is a historical snapshot and does not guarantee future income. High-yield stocks may carry elevated payout-cut risk. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Dividend yield is the annual dividend payment expressed as a percentage of the current share price, and it is the starting point for any income-investing analysis. If a stock at $50 pays $2 a year in dividends, the yield is 4%. It lets you compare the cash-generating power of wildly different investments on a common scale: a $200 stock paying $5 yields 2.5% while a $30 stock paying $1.50 yields 5%, even though the second costs less in absolute dollars. For US investors, dividend yield is central to retirement income planning, dividend growth investing, and the 'living off dividends' philosophy. A diversified portfolio of US dividend-paying stocks and REITs generating a blended 3% yield produces $30,000 per year on a $1,000,000 portfolio — no shares sold. The S&P 500 as a whole historically yields between 1.5% and 2.5%, so individual yields above 4% either come from income-focused sectors (utilities, REITs, energy) or reflect a price decline. This calculator computes your yield, projects your total income from any position size, and models how dividend growth compounds that income over time.
Dividend yield is simply Annual Dividend per Share ÷ Share Price × 100. A stock at $150 paying $4.50 per share yields 3.0%. Note the inverse relationship with price: the same dividend produces a higher yield when the share price falls and a lower yield when it rises. That is why screeners can flag 'attractive yields' right after a stock has crashed — the numerator may be unchanged while the denominator dropped. This tool adds two investor-focused outputs. First, position income: Annual Dividend per Share × Shares Held gives the actual cash you expect to receive this year. Second, growth-adjusted income: applying an expected annual dividend growth rate compounds income forward. A 3% yield growing at 7% annually doubles in payout power every ten years, which is why dividend-growth strategies matter more for long-term wealth than chasing today's highest yield. The 'yield on cost' concept — comparing current income to your original purchase price rather than today's price — is also surfaced by entering your original cost per share instead of the current price.
Dividend yield rises when share price falls. A 9% yield usually means the market has priced in a dividend cut or the company is over-distributing. Before buying a double-digit yield, check the payout ratio against earnings and the debt balance. History shows 'yield traps' — stocks with attractive yields that subsequently cut — destroy more income-investor wealth than any market downturn.
A stock yielding 2.5% today with an 8% annual payout growth beats one yielding 4.5% with 1% growth within roughly five years, and the gap widens forever after. A dividend that doubles in a decade is compounding income, while a static yield is a bond-like payment losing real value to inflation. Prioritize growth unless your income need is near-term.
REIT distributions are largely 'non-qualified' income taxed at ordinary rates (up to 37% plus state), unlike most blue-chip dividends taxed at 0-15-20% long-term rates. A 7% REIT yield after tax may match a 4.5% qualified dividend depending on your bracket. Hold high-yield REITs in tax-advantaged accounts where possible and factor the tax rate into net yield comparisons.
Dividend income is taxable in the year received. Qualified dividends from US corporations held over 61 days are taxed at 0%, 15%, or 20% federally; non-qualified dividends at ordinary rates. For comparison, reduce each yield by your expected tax rate: a 5% REIT yield after a 30% tax is effectively 3.5%, while a 4% qualified yield for a 15%-bracket investor becomes 3.4%.
A DRIP (Dividend Reinvestment Plan) automatically buys fractional shares with each dividend payment, compounding income into share count. Historically, reinvested dividends have accounted for roughly 40% of the S&P 500's total return over the long run. Switch to taking dividends as cash only once you are in or near retirement.
Before adding a dividend stock, verify three things: payout ratio under 70% of earnings, free cash flow covering the dividend, and a history of at least five consecutive increases. Dividend aristocrats — companies with 25+ consecutive years of increases — are a natural starting point for screening.
Greg, a 55-year-old pharmacist, focused on dividend growth: he bought a basket of consumer staples and industrial stocks averaging 3% yield with strong histories of increasing payouts. When his portfolio reached $480,000 he received $14,400 a year in dividends — $1,200 per month — without selling anything. By age 65, with the same companies still raising payouts, his income stream grew to over $2,000 a month.
Tanya bought a shipping company yielding 11% after its stock fell sharply. Within nine months the dividend was cut by 80% and the share price had fallen another 40%. The lesson cost her $8,000 and taught her to check the payout ratio, which had been 95% — the company was distributing nearly all earnings. She now uses this calculator to flag any yield above 6% as a research trigger, not a buy signal.
Bill and Karen Henderson, both retired, had $850,000 in a mix of dividend stocks and bond funds averaging 3.5% yield. That produced $29,750 annually — covering roughly 60% of their $48,000 annual budget. They paired dividend income with Social Security and used the portfolio as a buffer, selling nothing in down markets. Yield let them avoid the sequence-of-returns risk entirely.
Everything you need to know about this topic.

Financial Chaos Analyst
Ivy Sinclair-Wren is a Financial Chaos Analyst covering investing, AI, wealth psychology, and the emotional consequences of opening finance apps during market crashes. Based in Melbourne, she specializes in demystifying the US tax code and helping users navigate the intersection of spreadsheet logic and human irrationality.